Friday, January 27, 2017

2017 Arizona Auction Review - higher estimate lots

The prior post reviewed lower estimate lots at the 2017 Arizona collector car auctions, which built on the post reviewing the performance of the auction companies Bonhams, Gooding & Company, and RM Sotheby’s. This post looks at the cars in the higher estimate group from those three auctions. A car is assigned to the higher estimate group if the mid-estimate (the average of the pre-auction low estimate and high estimate) was at least $250,000. To further help with the evaluation of the strength of the bidding and the accuracy of the pre-auction estimates, the lots are classified by the condition of the car. I did the classification and used the definitions in the Hagerty Price Guide - with an added condition (#5) for non-running basket-case cars. In this higher estimate group, there were no condition #5 category cars and only one condition #4 category car. Condition #3 category cars numbered 37 examples across the three auctions - while #2 category cars and #1 category cars totaled 62 and 10, respectively. Only cars that were sold are included and all prices are before fees.

The scatter plot below shows results for the three auction companies for the higher estimate group. Each auction company and condition group can be plotted separately, and by moving the cursor over each point, the lot, auction, mid-estimate, and sale price can be seen. A single lot can be highlighted after selecting one of the three auctions in the drop-down menu, and then typing the lot number into the text box. Regression equations and trend lines can be plotted too by checking the box. Selecting ‘All’ auctions will perform the regression on the condition group(s) for all three auctions combined (where there is sufficient data), while the other menu options do not combine results for the regressions. The prices are before buyer’s fees.




The only condition #4 category car was a single-family owner 1955 Mercedes-Benz 300 SL Gullwing. Offered by Gooding & Company, lot 18, had a pre-auction mid-estimate of $1,000,000 and sold for $1,325,000. While the condition of the car may have made it hard to accurately value before the auction, the single-family ownership provenance may have encouraged strong bidding too.


Mercedes-Benz 300SL Gullwing 1955 1 Mercedes-Benz 300SL Gullwing 1955 2


The three auction companies had more cars in the condition #3 category group, which resulted in the following regression equation:

$price = $7860 + 0.76 x $mid-estimate

The 0.76 regression coefficient (the beta) suggests that buyers paid 76 percent (before fees) of the pre-auction mid-estimate plus $7,860 (the alpha) for cars in this condition group. The r2 of the regression was a high 0.99, which means that the mid-estimate explains 99 percent of the variance in the price. This high r2 number may be due to three cars sold at the Bonhams auction. Lot 24 was the 1963 Jaguar E-type Lightweight Competition, which had a pre-auction mid-estimate of $8,250,000 and sold for $6,700,000 (all prices are before fees). 


Jaguar E-type Lightweight Competition S 850667 eng no V682558P 1963 4

Lot 44 was the 1952 Ferrari 340 America Spider Competizione s/n 0196A by Vignale, which had a pre-auction mid-estimate of $8,250,000 and sold for $5,800,000. 

Ferrari 340 America Spider Competizione Vignale 0196A 1952 0

Lot 30 was the 1931 Alfa Romeo 6C 1750 5th Series Supercharged Gran Sport Spider by Zagato, which had a pre-auction mid-estimate of $3,100,000 and sold for $2,550,000. 

Alfa Romeo 6C 1750 5th Series Supercharged Gran Sport Spider Zagato 10814358 1931 1

These three points, and especially lots 24 and 44, make for a clean linear regression. One car that stands out from this regression was auctioned by RM Sotheby’s is lot 232, the 1924 Isotta Fraschini Tipo 8A Landaulet Sala & Riva, which had a pre-auction mid-estimate of $725,000 and sold for $395,000. 


Isotta Fraschini Tipo 8A Landaulet Sala & Riva 1924 1

While Isotta Fraschinis used to be popular cars in the U.S. back when they were new, their popularity may now be more limited, which makes pre-auction estimates more challenging and or limits buyer enthusiasm.

The condition #2 category cars were the most numerous of the higher estimate group with 62 cars sold across the three auctions. The regression equation for the category is the following:

$price = -$6224 + 0.84 x $mid-estimate

The 0.84 regression coefficient (the beta) suggests that buyers paid 84 percent (before fees) of the pre-auction mid-estimate, and as such were comfortable paying close to the pre-auction mid-estimate for a car in this condition #2 category. In contrast to the regression of condition #3 category cars, the intercept (the alpha) is a negative $6224, which means that after taking into consideration the pre-auction mid-estimate, cars in the condition #2 category were generally discounted by this amount. The r2 of the regression was a slightly lower 0.95, which means that the mid-estimate explains 95 percent of the variance in the price. One car that seems to have played a big part in the regression was auctioned by Bonhams. Lot 54 was the 1928 Mercedes-Benz Type S 26/120/180 Supercharged Sports Tourer Erdmann & Rossi, which had a pre-auction mid-estimate of $5,500,000 and sold for $4,375,000 (all prices are before fees). 



Mercedes-Benz Type S 26-120-180 Supercharged Sports Tourer Erdmann & Rossi 35323 eng no 66540 1928 1 Mercedes-Benz Type S 26/120/180 Supercharged Sports Tourer Erdmann & Rossi 35323 eng no 66540 1928 2

Two lots that seemed to do well for the condition #2 category were sold by RM Sotheby’s, which were lots 121 and 263. Lot 121 was the 2003 Aston Martin DB AR1 by Zagato, which had a pre-auction mid-estimate of $312,500 and sold for $345,000. 


Aston Martin DB AR1 Zagato 2003

Lot 263 was the 1969 Ferrari 365 GTS s/n 12489 by Pininfarina, which had a pre-auction mid-estimate of $3,200,000 and sold for $3,275,000. 


Ferrari 365 GTS Pininfarina 12489 1969

These cars were either conservatively valued before the auctions and or saw strong bidding during the auctions. On the other side of the results for the condition #2 category of cars, lot 48 at Bonhams and lot 28 at Gooding & Company seemed to be optimistically valued before the auctions and or saw limited bidding during the auctions. Lot 48 at Bonhams was the 1966 Ferrari 275 GTB Scaglietti Pininfarina s/n 08973, which had a pre-auction mid-estimate of $3,000,000 and sold for $1,575,000. 


Ferrari 275 GTB Scaglietti Pininfarina 08973 1966

This result is interesting considering the two Ferrari 275 GTBs that Gooding & Company failed to sell. Lot 46, the 1967 Ferrari 275 GTB/4 s/n 10563 (estimate $3,000,000 to $3,400,000) stopped at a high bid of $2,400,000, and lot 146, the 1966 Ferrari 275 GTB Long Nose Alloy s/n 08117 (estimate $2,900,000 to $3,200,000) stopped at a high bid of $2,500,000. 

Ferrari 275 GTB-4 Scaglietti 10563 eng no 10563 1967 Ferrari 275 GTB Long Nose Alloy 08117 1966

Lot 28 at Gooding & Company was the 1936 Bentley 4 1/4 Litre Cabriolet Antem, which had a pre-auction mid-estimate of $600,000 and sold for $320,000. 

Bentley 4 1-4 Litre Cabriolet Antem 1936

Considering that RM Sotheby’s failed to sell lot 153another condition #2 category car - a 1936 Bentley 3 1/2 Litre Sedanca Coupe by Windovers 

Bentley 3 1-2 Litre Sedanca Coupe Windovers 1936 

with pre-auction mid-estimate of $362,500 but only a high bid of $270,000 – perhaps the markets for Ferrari 275 GTBs and 1930s Bentleys are changing.   

There were fewer best-in-the-world condition #1 category cars in the higher estimate group than in the lower estimate group, at 10 and 15, respectively. With few observations available, the r2 was 1.0, meaning that the mid-estimate of the cars in this category explained 100 percent of the variance in the sale price. With so few cars and apparently little disagreement about the value of those cars, the errors for lots in the condition #1 category regression tend to offset each other. The regression equation for the category is the following:

$price = $20 731 + 0.76 x $mid-estimate

In this condition category, the regression coefficient (the beta) of 0.76 means that buyers paid 76 percent of the mid-estimate plus an additional $20731 (the alpha) all before fees. Compared to the regression of condition #1 category cars in the lower estimate group, which had a beta of 0.62 and an alpha of $12963, the values of alpha and beta are greater in the higher estimate group. It suggests that the pre-auction mid-estimates are viewed as a bit more accurate in the higher estimate group and that bidders are willing to pay a higher premium for cars in this condition and estimate group. Two lots that stand out in this condition #1 category group were sold by RM Sotheby’s and were lots 231 and 258. Lot 231 was the 1961 Ferrari 400 Superamerica SWB Coupe Aerodinamico s/n 2841SA by Pininfarina, which had a pre-auction mid-estimate of $3,550,000 and sold for $2,800,000 (all prices are before fees). 


Ferrari 400 Superamerica SWB Coupe Aerodinamico Pininfarina 2841 SA 1961 1 Ferrari 400 Superamerica SWB Coupe Aerodinamico Pininfarina 2841 SA 1961 3

Lot 258 was the 1939 Mercedes-Benz 540K Special Roadster by Sindelfingen, which had a pre-auction mid-estimate of $7,900,000 and sold for $6,000,000. 


Mercedes-Benz 540K Special Roadster Sindelfingen 408383 1939 1 Mercedes-Benz 540K Special Roadster Sindelfingen 408383 1939 2 


In terms of scooping up a good deal and or an example of a car with an optimistic pre-auction estimate, RM Sotheby’s lot 134, a 1939 Bugatti T57 Cabriolet by Letourneur et Marchand had a pre-auction mid-estimate of $1,375,000 and sold for $925,000.


Bugatti T57 Cabriolet Letourneur et Marchand 57587 eng no 458 1939


Disclaimer


JohnWileyCars provides no warranty about the content or accuracy of the content published here. JohnWileyCars shall not be liable for any loss of profit or any other damages resulting from the use of the information published here.

No comments:

Post a Comment